After our discussion last week, I was doing some research on how
Voltaire is still relevant to us today and came across an article from January
in The Guardian entitled “Voltaire’s Treatise on Tolerance becomes bestseller
following Paris attacks.” During the week following the Charlie Hebdo attacks, the Treatise on Tolerance by Voltaire became a popular title to read in the religion and philosophy genre. The article stated that after the Charlie Hebdo
attacks, people and world leaders protested in solidarity down Boulevard
Voltaire. Images of Voltaire with “Je suis Charlie” on it were circulating
around the Internet and alike which further more instilled the idea of Voltaire
as a symbol for freedom of expression. The Société Voltaire had some strong
thoughts on the issue and proclaimed that “‘It was also Voltaire that [the killers]
wanted to assassinate’, meaning the Enlightenment legacy of skeptical
rationality, laicité (secularism),
free-ranging curiosity and battles against censorship that he embodied.”
I was curious about this Société Voltaire, since I had not heard of it, and
read some of their articles posted on their website. La Société Voltaire was
created on May 30, 2000 on the 222nd anniversary of the death of
Voltaire. Their goal is to encourage and promote the studies, research and
events regarding all things Voltaire. Their website is very interesting since it has
activities listed, bulletins and publications to read, as well as debates,
surveys and publications.
One bulletin caught my eye in particular from around the time of
the Charlie Hebdo attacks. The author of this article wants us to reflect on
what Voltaire said in his time on the issue of religion and fanaticism as they
are still a problem today. Voltaire states on the death of Marc-Antoine that
“In either case the abuse of holy religion has led to a great crime. It is,
therefore, of interest to the race to inquire whether religion ought to be charitable
or barbaric.” The author says that in Voltaire’s point of view holy religion is
characterized by the unity of people with a “sense of mutual goodwill.” This is
applicative to today’s society because it is not the differences between the
religious and the atheist, between the Christian and non-Christian, etc. that
is an issue, but rather the line between barbarism
and civilization. The barbarian is stupid and vicious. The civilized is
knowledgeable, a critical thinker and exhibits tolerance. In Voltaire’s Treatise
on Toleration, the allegation that Marc-Antoine was murdered by his father Jean Calas because he did not want his son to convert to Catholicism is an
example of intolerance and barbarism due to differences in religious beliefs. If someone
is supposed to be religious why would they commit such a crime? This religious
intolerance shows the ignorance that is commonly found among people every day in society.
Instead of acting upon our internal hatred for someone’s religion, we could
learn from Voltaire and be accepting and just toward others and their
differences in religion by fighting against barbarism.
Anger and frustration toward someone or a group of people due to
their religious beliefs is not constructive for anyone. It accomplishes nothing
and nothing is gained in the process. To exhibit tolerance of someone one must
express a fair and objective attitude to people whose beliefs and opinions are
different from their own. One must acknowledge the differences that exist and
live with it. Being tolerant does not mean you agree with all of the beliefs of
another religion it just means that you are respectful of them and allow them
to express themselves freely in society.
As Voltaire says, “Not only is it cruel to persecute, in this brief
life, those who differ from us, but I am not sure if it is not too bold to
declare that they are damned eternally. It seems to me that it is not the place
of the atoms of a moment, such as we are, thus to anticipate the decrees of the
Creator.” We should not be in judgment of others as God will be the ultimate
judge, “transport yourselves with me to the day on which all men will be
judged, when God will deal with each according to his works.”
No comments:
Post a Comment